Countercannonical Living

What IS “canonical architecture”? Is the “canon” supremacist by definition?
Reimagining a monument by a nazi sympathizer overtaken by everyday people living everyday lives.

+ Design Yard Sale 







 
We Can Fit
Citygroup, NYC



One Manhattan Square is drawn to serve diverse subjectivities, habits, situations, and income levels. The plan is not necessarily reinvented, however, it is adapted to fit the trends, forces, and realities that keep populating New York City residential buildings. The plan is a drawing type that can both “determine” but also “accomodate” life, it is both active form and stuff container. The plan also reflects occupation, the different forms of appropriation of inhabitants, short and tall, residents or tourists, any gender preference, and in any socially normative grouping or not. The plan organizes, or so we believe, yet it is–particularly in the residential realm–our lost battle with its occupants. Our agency strives in the principle of organization but as it has been clearly stated elsewhere, the architect has no effect of permanence as owners can reconfigure walls as they wish. Unlike other professions such as law or medicine, the authority of architecture is conveyed only momentarily through an idealized plan of living which loses its potency as soon as the work has been delivered. The plan is also opportunity, a tool to have access to inhabitation and real living, the unexpected, the forced, or inevitable schemes for surviving in a city that expulses its residents, transient or not, into the margins or beyond.

Reconfiguring unit sizes, unit entrances, amount of access, number and size of rooms, can open-up possibilities for reorganization for a common “we,” more inclusive and more affordable, however, is precisely the lack of (or very limited)
agency on the process of making, designing, and constructing renewed organizations that constrain our capacities to have a significant effect; unless we are the designers, developers and contractors disinterested in reproducing the current paradigms of ownership and real estate. This is a rather difficult reality. However we can imagine differently, we can register and document the modes of inhabitation that could emerge under these circumstances, this is, under the pressure of living–and surviving, in less expected configurations of “stuff.”

Real living is in fact, in rem of the idealized plans and renderings. There’s no irony in the building’s promoter’s render of a white woman, long light ironed-hair, almost self seduced by her new Dior shoes right next to a Gucci shopping bag, on a top room overlooking the north of Manhattan. That is, perhaps, the disjuncted reality that could live, or at least acquire these apartments. WE CAN FIT speaks to the real living, the living we experience ourselves, through our friend’s stories, through Craigslists ads, all who reveal the less ideal and more fitting reality. A reality full of stuff, of extra beds, or lonely people, of overcrowdedness, or inclusive social groupings that completely reconfigure the plan, not by redoing it, but by allowing us to fit.

+ Lexi Tsien and Marcelo Lopez Dinardi + Also featured on Non-Domestico



Vernacular Chinatowns

Observations on Chinese modes of seating in the PRC. 


Without the Plan, Citygroup, NYC
59 Henry Street 

Chinatown resilience - a proposal to turn a parking lot into affordable housing, a community garden, grocery, and plant store (instead of luxury condos) 🌱

Exhibition forthcoming!
   

BASED IN NYC